Subject	Re: Kinda backwards swap, but ok.
Posted by	njz on January 16, 2011 at 3:09 PM
	This message has been viewed 252 times.
In Reply To	Kinda backwards swap, but ok. (n/m) posted by ZiNnYc on January 16, 2011 at 02:56 PM
Message	I rather have a lower cruising rpm, besides I think the Z has the power to overcome the 3.69 gear.
Follow Ups	R200 to R230 swap - njz 14:23:30 01/16/11 the rest of the TT swap ;) (n/m) - TeddyZ(SFC) 14:27:02 01/16/11 Read my profile (n/m) - njz 14:28:23 01/16/11 the entire TT rear subframe and a different driveshaft. (n/m) - z32ryan 14:30:23 01/16/11 My understanding is - njz 14:50:34 01/16/11 NO! front and rear bushing are spaced farther apart on a TT. - Dane (Houston) 15:52:06 01/16/11 best thing you could do is trade with someone in your - Dane (Houston) 15:55:29 01/16/11 Correct - plus you need a HICAS delete bar. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 15:58:30 01/16/11 Kinda backwards swap, but ok. (n/m) - ZiNnYc 14:56:05 01/16/11 Re: Kinda backwards swap, but ok. - njz 15:09:19 01/16/11 Cheapest solution, 10 % taller tires :) (n/m) - ztunerz 10:44:51 01/17/11 alternative for 3.69 gearing: swap in Q45 differential. - nissansx 17:41:27 01/16/11 ^ What he said, it is a 3.54 ratio. (n/m) - ClayZ90TT 18:39:40 01/16/11 The Armada came with optional gear ratios of 2.93 and - SirpriZ 22:53:35 01/16/11 could you just swap the gears from an armada diff to the z - komplexZTT 07:54:27 01/17/11 Re: R200 to R230 swap - DWoods 23:28:09 01/16/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.